Solved

TABLE 10-14 the Use of Preservatives by Food Processors Has Become a Become

Question 198

Multiple Choice

TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below.
Preservative I Preservative II
I TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. Preservative I Preservative II I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours -Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D) = 106.4 hours TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. Preservative I Preservative II I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours -Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D) II = 96.54 hours
SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours
-Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II.


A) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. Preservative I Preservative II I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours -Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
B) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. Preservative I Preservative II I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours -Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
C) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. Preservative I Preservative II I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours -Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
D) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. Preservative I Preservative II I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours -Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q193: TABLE 10-3<br>A real estate company is interested

Q194: TABLE 10-14<br>The use of preservatives by food

Q195: TABLE 10-12<br>A quality control engineer is in

Q196: TABLE 10-10<br>A corporation randomly selects 150 salespeople

Q197: TABLE 10-12<br>A quality control engineer is in

Q199: TABLE 10-14<br>The use of preservatives by food

Q200: TABLE 10-15<br>The table below presents the summary

Q201: If we wish to determine whether there

Q202: TABLE 10-8<br>A few years ago, Pepsi invited

Q203: TABLE 10-9<br>The following Excel output contains the