Multiple Choice
Suppose that the maximum depth of visualization using a 3.5-MHz transducer is 14.2 cm. On the previous two tests, 3 months and 6 months earlier, it was 14.4 and 14.1 cm, respectively. These variations should be interpreted as
A) just barely tolerable performance.
B) normal variations inherent in the machine.
C) excessive variations, indicating that the machine requires immediate service.
D) normal variations inherent in the measurement process.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A measure of the minimum spacing along
Q2: Maximum depth of visualization tests are performed
Q3: A scan is done of a uniform
Q4: For the measurement described in question 7,
Q5: A measurement comparing the actual separation between
Q7: For which of the following tests would
Q8: The maximum depth of visualization can indicate
Q9: Maximum depth of visualization is often limited
Q10: On the viewing monitor of a scanner,