Multiple Choice
The management of Holdaway Corporation would like to investigate the possibility of basing its predetermined overhead rate on activity at capacity. The company's controller has provided an example to illustrate how this new system would work. In this example, the allocation base is machine-hours and the estimated amount of the allocation base for the upcoming year is 71,100 machine-hours. Capacity is 80,100 machine-hours and the actual level of activity for the year is assumed to be 67,000 machine-hours. All of the manufacturing overhead is fixed and both the estimated amount at the beginning of the year and the actual amount at the end of the year are assumed to be $5,701,518 per year. For simplicity, it is assumed that this is the estimated manufacturing overhead for the year as well as the manufacturing overhead at capacity. It is further assumed that this is also the actual amount of manufacturing overhead for the year.If the company bases its predetermined overhead rate on capacity, then the predetermined overhead rate is closest to:
A) $80.19 per machine-hour
B) $78.00 per machine-hour
C) $85.10 per machine-hour
D) $71.18 per machine-hour
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q243: Nielsen Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Machining and
Q244: Dearden Corporation uses a job-order costing system
Q245: Morataya Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Machining and
Q246: Boward Corporation has two production departments, Milling
Q247: Lueckenhoff Corporation uses a job-order costing system
Q249: Merati Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Forming and
Q250: Fillmore Corporation uses a job-order costing system
Q251: Kluth Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Molding and
Q252: Gilchrist Corporation bases its predetermined overhead rate
Q253: Stockmaster Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Forming and