Multiple Choice
James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards,Inc.Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing.While employed there,Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms.When confronted with the peep holes,Keller denied every using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting.The shop manager was told to fire Keller.Shortly after Keller left,a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned,through conversations with Keller,that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits.Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her.
-Radical Boards:
A) cannot be held liable to the teen and her mother because it did engage in the conduct.
B) could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise.
C) is no longer liable because it terminated Keller.
D) has not committed any tort because watching customers in dressing rooms in part of a merchant's right.
E) none of the above
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q97: Slander is oral defamation.
Q111: Which of the following statements best describes
Q112: Opinion commentary is not defamation.
Q113: Comparative negligence,if established,is a complete defense to
Q114: Suppose A-Plus Linens sent the following notice
Q117: Some damages other than emotional damages must
Q118: The use of someone's photo for commercial
Q119: Comparative negligence reduces the plaintiff's recovery.
Q120: Testimony in a court room is not
Q121: Whistle-blowers may have some statutory protection by