Multiple Choice
TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below.
Preservative I Preservative II
I = 106.4 hours II = 96.54 hours
SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours
-Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II.
A) versus
B) versus
C) versus
D) versus
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: TABLE 10-5<br>To test the effectiveness of a
Q31: TABLE 10-3<br>A real estate company is
Q47: If we are testing for the difference
Q74: The F test used for testing the
Q94: TABLE 10-11<br>The dean of a college is
Q110: TABLE 10-6<br>To investigate the efficacy of a
Q141: TABLE 10-15<br>The table below presents the summary
Q144: TABLE 10-7<br>A buyer for a manufacturing plant
Q182: TABLE 10-7<br>A buyer for a manufacturing plant
Q200: TABLE 10-15<br>The table below presents the summary