In Which of the Following Cases Did the Court Extend

Multiple Choice

In which of the following cases did the Court extend the Tarasoff requirement by deciding that information provided by a family member of an adult client and not by the client could trigger the "duty to protect" requirement?

A) Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
B) Ewing v. Goldstein
C) Kansas v. Hendricks
D) Kansas v. Crane