Multiple Choice
What was the result in the Case Opener, the case involving whether a bank account and cash not specifically referenced in the will passed to the sole beneficiary named in a will or through intestate succession when the will did not contain a residuary clause?
A) That the land passed to the sole beneficiary named in the will because it was apparent that the deceased meant for him to receive her entire estate.
B) That the estate was partially intestate and that the bank account and land at issue passed through intestate succession.
C) That the land passed to the state because the disposition of it was unclear.
D) That the land would have passed through intestate succession if the decedent had any issue, meaning children or grandchildren; but that because she had no children or grandchildren, the land and bank account passed to the sole beneficiary of the will.
E) That the value of the land and bank account would be split on a 50/50 basis between the sole beneficiary named in the will and the relatives who would inherit through intestate succession.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q80: How many states, if any, have adopted
Q81: Wills are ambulatory which means<br>A) That a
Q82: [Secretary Visits] Kara wrote a will leaving
Q83: Which of the following would have an
Q84: Bolton lived with his dying grandmother until
Q85: If an agent is in possession of
Q86: Distribution per stirpes means distributing an estate<br>A)
Q88: Regarding a trust, which of the following
Q89: What was the result in Mattison v.
Q90: When determining whether a person has testamentary