Multiple Choice
What was the result in Patterson v. Dominos' Pizza, LLC, the case in the text addressing whether a franchisor can be held vicariously liable by a franchisee's employee for sexual harassment, retaliation, and tort claims?
A) The franchisor failed to remedy sexual harassment by the franchisee, and thus was vicariously liable.
B) The franchisor was not vicariously liable for sexual harassment by the franchisee because it was not the plaintiff's employer.
C) The franchisor was vicariously liable for sexual harassment by the franchisee because it was the plaintiff's employer.
D) The franchise agreement governed whether or not the franchisor was vicariously liable for sexual harassment by the franchisee.
E) The case was remanded to the trial court to determine whether the franchisor stands in an employment or agency position in relation to the franchisee and its employees, in order to determine if the plaintiff-employee can pursue her claims against the franchisor.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: Delly and Telum are in a franchise
Q51: [Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners
Q52: An example of a syndicate would be:<br>A)
Q53: Which of the following is a partnership
Q54: [Language-Science Kits] The president of Kool Science,
Q56: [Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners
Q57: [Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners
Q58: [Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners
Q59: A(n) _ is created when members for
Q60: [Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners