Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Michael J. Kane, Jr. v. Grace Kroll, the case in the text in which the defendant issued a check to the plaintiff to cover the plaintiff's sale of cows to the defendant's son, but later stopped payment on the check because her son said he could not repay her?
A) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because the stop payment order prevented the plaintiff from being a holder in due course.
B) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because, although he was a holder in due course, the stop payment order negated his entitlement to payment.
C) The plaintiff was not allowed to recover because the defendant established a lack of consideration to her.
D) The plaintiff was allowed to recover on a contract theory although he was not a holder in due course.
E) The plaintiff was allowed to recover because he was a holder in due course.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q77: [House Painting] Graciela Reyes signed a check
Q78: Which of the following was the result
Q79: One who possesses a cashier's check payable
Q80: Once an instrument is negotiable, it remains
Q81: [Check Issues] Kelsey owns and operates a
Q83: A party who receives a negotiable instrument
Q84: A person who engages in fraud may
Q85: Under the Shelter Principle:<br>A) A holder may
Q86: A(n) _ endorsement is the endorser's signature
Q87: The _ is a concept that if