In the Text Case, Lucy Mydlach V

Multiple Choice

In the text case, Lucy Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp, the questions at issue were whether the plaintiff could bring a revocation of acceptance claim against a vehicle manufacturer, and when the statute of limitations began to run under the Magnuson-Moss Act. Which of the following was the result on appeal?

A) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
B) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
C) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
D) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
E) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the manufacturer was notified that a problem with the vehicle existed.