Multiple Choice
In the case that opened the chapter, Abbott Industries supplied 1.2 million tubes of bad eye medication to Altana, a customer, for resale. What did the court rule regarding the liability of Abbott Industries?
A) That Abbott industries was liable for the cost of the recall and destruction of the defective medication, for the costs of employee overtime, and for lost future sales because Altana was unable to meet its contractual obligations.
B) That Abbott industries was liable for the cost of the recall and destruction of the defective medication, for the costs of employee overtime, and for lost future sales even though Altana was able to meet its contractual obligations.
C) That Abbott industries was liable for the cost of the recall and destruction of the defective medication and for the costs of employee overtime, but not for lost future sales because Altana was able to meet its contractual obligations.
D) That Altana was only entitled to receive cover, meaning substitution for the defective medication.
E) That Altana was unable to recover anything because business people take a risk that some shipments will be bad.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: What a buyer must do in obtaining
Q11: Specific performance usually requires that the seller
Q12: Henry and Xavier are merchants under the
Q13: Tort law is primarily designed to vindicate
Q14: What are the rights of the parties
Q16: When buyers or lessees want to accept
Q17: Fred's Fireplaces enters into a contract with
Q18: Which of the following is NOT something
Q19: Fred's Fireplaces enters into a contract with
Q20: List the various options discussed in the