Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in the case in the text, Fantastic Sams Salons Corp. v. PSTEVO, LLC and Jeremy Baker, in which the court considered PSTEVO's counterclaim for fraudulent misrepresentation with regard to a franchise agreement?
A) It is illegal to force a party to sign a disclaimer about representations made, and thus defendants were allowed to proceed with their counterclaim.
B) The disclaimer was invalid and thus defendants were allowed to proceed with their counterclaim.
C) The counterclaim was dismissed because the disclaimer in the contract prohibited defendants from filing a claim.
D) The counterclaim was dismissed even though the disclaimer was invalid.
E) The counterclaim was dismissed because, in response to a disclaimer in the contract, defendant affirmed that certain representations were not made.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q32: If the parties have entered into a
Q33: Why is it important to distinguish between
Q34: Intent to deceive may not be inferred
Q35: The statement of fact need not be
Q36: In the case of Fantastic Sams Salons
Q38: [Pet Pig Farm] Jen was interested in
Q39: [Scheming 'Friends'] Richard wants to rent a
Q40: If both parties are mistaken about a
Q41: Fraudulent misrepresentation is also referred to as
Q42: Gloria makes a representation about a car