Solved

In Lopez V

Question 72

Multiple Choice

In Lopez v. Kmart Corporation, the case in the text regarding disaffirmance, did the court find the minor plaintiff's disaffirmance of an employment contract to be reasonable?


A) Yes, because the disaffirmance occurred within one month of reaching the age of majority.
B) Yes, because the disaffirmance occurred within six months of reaching the age of majority.
C) The court did not find the disaffirmance to be reasonable.
D) No, because the plaintiff could have disaffirmed the contract when he was under the age of majority but chose not to do so.
E) Yes, because the type of contract at issue was an arbitration agreement.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions