Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case nugget, Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc., involving an advertisement for the sale of fur coats?
A) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it involved a luxury good.
B) The court ruled that the advertisement was an offer but that the customer who was suing had not properly accepted.
C) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it was a ridiculously low offer which the plaintiff should have known was not to be taken seriously.
D) The court ruled that the ad was not an offer because ads are never offers, only invitations for customers to make an offer.
E) The court ruled that the ad was an offer and that the plaintiff properly accepted it.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: The mirror-image rule says that terms of
Q30: An advertisement in a paper states: "first
Q31: Mary accepts Joe's offer to buy 100
Q32: Which of the following terms would be
Q33: Which of the following is true of
Q35: The number of circumstances under which silence
Q36: Madison signs a contract with Rainbow Readers
Q37: Mary is selling her house for $100,000
Q38: What is an implied-in-fact contract?<br>A) A contract
Q39: List the ways in which an offer