Multiple Choice
[MegaTron] Emilia filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) , alleging that her employer, MegaTron, failed to promote her because of her nationality and gender. The EEOC had already received several discrimination charges from other employees alleging similar conduct by MegaTron. When Emilia was hired, she signed an employment contract with a clause stating that all work-related claims must be resolved through arbitration.
-If the EEOC filed an enforcement lawsuit based on the allegations of Emilia and other employees, what would a court likely do?
A) Dismiss the lawsuit, because of Emilia's poor performance.
B) Dismiss the lawsuit because of the binding arbitration clause in Emilia's employment contract.
C) Allow the lawsuit to move forward, as long as Emilia gets no relief whatsoever.
D) Allow the lawsuit to move forward because the EEOC is not a party to the employment contract, and it has the authority to pursue relief for Emilia regardless of how the employer and employee agreed to resolve their disputes.
E) Allow the lawsuit because arbitration clauses in employment contracts are unconscionable.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following is not a
Q3: [Sexual harassment ADR] Naomi works at a
Q4: In which of the following do parties
Q5: [Sexual harassment ADR] Naomi works at a
Q6: [Salsa Sensations] Sofia, co-owner of a popular
Q8: [Jade Shoes] Coleman owns a sporting goods
Q9: Courts are generally critical and unsupportive of
Q10: What was the result in the Case
Q11: [MegaTron] Emilia filed a charge of discrimination
Q12: [Sexual harassment ADR] Naomi works at a