Essay
Marty is a correctional officer at a federal prison. As a tool of intimidation, the inmates have formed a gang and continuously made threats to the officers and their families. Marty has never complied with the gangs' demands, which has caused great animosity between him and the gang members. One day, Maxwell, the leader of prison's gang, is to be released. Maxwell has told Marty that when he gets out, he is going to take his revenge on Marty by killing Marty's entire family. On the date of his release, Marty followed Maxwell to a liquor store. As Maxwell left the store, Marty followed him to a remote alley where Marty shot Maxwell six times in the back and neck. Marty's defense was that he stopped Maxwell before Maxwell could hurt Marty's family. Marty claims his action was in self-defense. Under what circumstances does the court recognize an individual's right to act in defense against another? According to the general rules of self-defense, is Marty justified in killing Maxwell? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Under either the alter ego rule or the m...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q56: _ defenses are defenses in which the
Q57: All of the following are elements of
Q58: Necessity is based on the assumption that
Q59: In order to use the necessity defense,
Q60: A form of retreat in which an
Q62: The _ provides that an individual inside
Q63: The _ defense recognizes that conduct that
Q64: Travis was hanging out with his friends
Q65: These acts deserve condemnation, but the defendant
Q66: The judge presents his or her witnesses