Multiple Choice
Imagine that states could still engage in unrelated commerce with foreign nations, as they could under the Articles of Confederation.Now, suppose an American president-going against the free trade-oriented, national economic policies of recent American history-placed steep tariffs on imports.What if a group of free trade-friendly states then sought an independent trade agreement with the affected countries? Why might this prove to be as much of a problem today as it was under the Articles?
A) Allowing states to negotiate trade agreements with foreign countries would bring with it the possibility that one state could try to undermine others in the competition for trade.
B) A poorly designed trade agreement could send the entire country into a recession, and not just affect the states that developed it.
C) A poorly designed agreement, and confusion over states' ability to handle oversight of its implementation, could easily send the country into war with a neighbor or foreign ally.
D) There would be no problem.If the states that sought the trade agreement cooperated with each other, they could overcome any damage done by presidential actions.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Compared to the confederation principle of the
Q4: Two of the three American presidents selected
Q6: Which constitutional provision was intended to ensure
Q8: In the system devised by the framers
Q9: Why, a few years before the Constitutional
Q10: Why did the framers fear excessive democracy?
Q11: Before a constitutional amendment led to direct
Q12: The two major compromises that led to
Q91: The Constitution makes no direct mention of
Q95: In the absence of an amendment, any