Essay
Smith & Jones audit firm is determining whether to accept an audit engagement with Simple Things Ltd. As this would be a new engagement the audit firm sought the client's permission to contact the current auditor. The client did not give their permission, explaining that they did not want the current auditors to know they were thinking of changing.
Recently Simple Things Ltd had been in the media for management not disclosing an environmental disaster that occurred at one of their plant sites. The incident is still under investigation but if the company is found to be at fault then they may be subject to numerous lawsuits from the many private landholders near the plant.
From the information provided above, identify any reasons for not accepting the audit engagement with Simple Things Ltd.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The client did not give permission to co...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q21: Anne has been preparing the audit working
Q22: Williams, Sparks and Kent audit partners have
Q23: The reliance on client internal audit personnel
Q24: You are the senior auditor on a
Q25: Identify the primary considerations that apply to
Q27: Which of the following is not a
Q28: When auditing for fraud the auditors should
Q29: The purpose of using analytical procedures in
Q30: The title of a certain working paper
Q31: Concerning errors, irregularities and illegal acts, the