Multiple Choice
Rashid saw Charles "rear-end" Francine's car at a stop sign. Immediately following the accident he told Charles that he would testify that Francine had been over the white line and had backed up into Charles, if Charles paid him $200. Charles agreed and Rashid provided his testimony in court. The police can prove Rashid is lying.
A) Francine could successfully sue Rashid for slander.
B) Francine could successfully sue Rashid for slander and would be awarded punitive damages.
C) Francine would lose a slander suit because Rashid could raise the defence of absolute privilege, though Rashid could be charged with the crime of perjury.
D) Francine would lose a slander suit because Rashid could raise the defence of qualified privilege, although Rashid could be charged with the crime of perjury.
E) If Rashid had lied only out of friendship, rather than for money, he could not be sued by Francine nor charged by the police.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: Jason, a department store detective, saw Andrew
Q29: While driving, Charles "rear-ended" Francine's car at
Q30: George borrowed a very valuable art book
Q31: At an all-candidates meeting prior to the
Q32: Dan had been notified by his landlord,
Q34: Nadeem was a blogger who provided comments
Q35: Andy entered a small restaurant and sat
Q36: Which of the following fact patterns does
Q37: Peter, a professional water skier, was very
Q38: Natasha was enraged when another driver cut