Multiple Choice
In a study by O'Neill and Gopnik (1991) , 4- and 5-year-olds were able to correctly describe what was in a tunnel and how they knew what was there. Three-year-olds, however, were not as successful. How did the researchers know that the 3-year-olds did not understand the source of their knowledge?
A) The 3-year-olds could not identify what was in the tunnel.
B) Some children reported seeing things in the tunnel that were not there.
C) Some children identified a ball as blue after feeling it but not seeing it.
D) Many children identified a ball in the tunnel when there was no ball there.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Egocentrism is characterized by one-dimensional thinking.
Q37: Sprouting refers to the development of new
Q79: Young children are able to use retrieval
Q116: Scaffolding is a useful concept for understanding
Q165: What understanding does conservation require?<br>A) that dreams
Q166: Jack's parents are told that Jack's toilet-training
Q168: Which term refers to changing one's speech
Q171: Which of the following requires fine motor
Q174: Most preschoolers do not engage in rehearsal
Q175: What is the definition of "transductive" reasoning?<br>A)