Multiple Choice
Paul sees Dan repeatedly enter Paul's land at least twice a week over a six-month period.The only time Dan knew that Paul objected was when Paul sued Dan for trespass to land.________.
A) There was a trespass to land because Dan did not have permission to enter Paul's land.
B) The action for trespass to land will fail because Paul's silence could reasonably be interpreted as consent to enter the land.
C) There was a trespass to land because Dan carelessly interpreted Paul's silence as consent.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: MATCHING<br>-the employer is liable for the torts
Q18: Reasonable force in defense of property can
Q19: Before force is used to recapture chattels,
Q20: Which of the following is not an
Q21: The main test for consent is subjective-whether
Q23: MATCHING<br>-reasonable use of another's property to protect
Q24: What is the defense of self-defense, and
Q25: You can never use the defense of
Q26: Which of the following is not a
Q27: If you use the privilege of private