Multiple Choice
MATCHING
-how convincing something must be
A) proximate cause
B) actual cause
C) standard of proof
D) preexisting condition
E) duty to mitigate damages
F) thin-skull rule
G) highly extraordinary
H) judgment proof
I) intervening cause
J) superseding cause
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: MATCHING<br>-but for or substantial factor<br>A)strict liability<br>B)wild animal<br>C)actual
Q23: The two tests for actual cause are<br>A)but-for
Q24: MATCHING<br>-a cause beyond the foreseeable risk originally
Q25: MATCHING<br>-few or no assets<br>A)proximate cause<br>B)actual cause<br>C)standard of
Q26: MATCHING<br>-a new or independent force that produces
Q27: Under the mitigation-of-damages rule, the defendant will
Q29: Legal cause is established<br>A)if the intervening cause
Q30: The two components of proximate cause are
Q31: When is an intervening criminal human force
Q32: The two components of proximate cause are<br>A)actual