Multiple Choice
MATCHING
-doing something
A) duty
B) foreseeable plaintiff
C) unforeseeable plaintiff
D) Cardozo test
E) Andrews
F) zone of danger
G) misfeasance
H) nonfeasance
I) malfeasance
J) special relationship
K) undertaking
L) gratuitous
M) consideration
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Without a special relationship, the existence of
Q2: MATCHING<br>-performed or given without a duty or
Q3: Palsgraf is a famous case that helped
Q4: MATCHING<br>-someone not in the zone of danger<br>A)duty<br>B)foreseeable
Q5: The Andrews test is broader than the
Q7: Nonfeasance can never be the basis of
Q8: MATCHING<br>-wrongful (illegal) actions by a public official<br>A)duty<br>B)foreseeable
Q9: What is the difference between the zone-of-danger
Q10: In the law of negligence, what is
Q11: MATCHING<br>-an obligation to conform to a standard