Multiple Choice
In the summer after your first year at law school, you begin an internship at a Texas law firm called "Execution Stoppers." As you discerned from their name, they specialize in keeping accused criminals off death row. On your first day at the firm, they ask you to write a memo summarizing their three easiest cases of the month. Case 1 involves a 17 year-old boy who is accused of felony murder, a capital offense in that state. Case 2 involves an accused murdered whose IQ score is 62. Case 3 involves an individual who raped and murdered a child. Answer the following questions about the report you will craft to summarize these cases.
-In order to prevent the 17 year-old boy from being executed, "Execution Stoppers" merely needs to mention one Supreme Court precedent. Based on your first year of training in law school, you recognize that this 2005 case is called:
A) Atkins v. Virginia
B) Miranda v. Arizona
C) Ewing v. California
D) Roper v. Simmons
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Completion:<br>-Recognizing that restitution is not practical in
Q23: Under a scheme of _ sentencing, judges
Q24: Indeterminate sentencing is linked conceptually to the
Q25: The Supreme Court has held that prison
Q26: Prison officials cannot restrict the visitation privileges
Q28: Completion:<br>-Historically legislatures allowed judges to sentence criminals
Q29: Restitution is the conditional release of a
Q30: In 1993 the Supreme Court held that
Q31: Which one of the following statements regarding
Q32: Completion:<br>-Early forms of criminal punishment were based