Whenever Different Interpretations of the Facts Lead to Sharply Divergent

Multiple Choice

Whenever different interpretations of the facts lead to sharply divergent conclusions about who is actually the guilty party and who really is the injured party, which of the following is most true?

A) The individual who has the least history of police contact is typically the victim.
B) It is most likely that both should be charged, allowing the courts to tease it out.
C) It is useless to try to pursue any sort of criminal justice-based resolution.
D) Knee-jerk pro-victim impulses provide no useful guidance for action.