Multiple Choice
In _________, the Supreme Court ruled that the crime for which the defendant was prosecuted was a variant of the common-law offense of larceny and that failure to include the intent requirement in the statute did not eliminate the element of intent.
A) United States v.United States Gypsum Co.(1978)
B) United States v.Knight (2007)
C) Holloway v.United States (1999)
D) Morrissette v.United States (1952)
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Normally, to convict a person of a
Q6: _ is the intent to engage in
Q7: Many mala prohibita crimes are _ offenses.<br>A)common-law<br>B)mala
Q8: To be found guilty of a crime
Q9: The traditional elements of a crime are
Q11: At common law, a person whose intentional
Q12: What is the difference between general and
Q13: "[U]nder the doctrine of _, it is
Q14: In 2011 Congress adopted the Model Penal
Q15: Strict liability crimes are exceptions to the