Multiple Choice
TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue. Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below.
Preservative I Preservative II
I = 106.4 hours
II= 96.54 hours
SI = 10.3 hours SII = 13.4 hours
-Referring to Table 10-14, state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II.
A) H₀: σI² ⁻ σII² ≥ 0 versus H₁: σI² - σII² < 0
B) H₀: σI² ⁻ σII² ≤ 0 versus H₁: σI² - σII² > 0
C) H₀: σI² ⁻ σII² = 0 versus H₁: σI² - σII² ≠ 0
D) H₀: σI² ⁻ σII² ≠ 0 versus H₁: σI² - σII² = 0
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: TABLE 10-19<br>An agronomist wants to compare the
Q31: TABLE 10-16<br>An airline wants to select a
Q32: TABLE 10-20<br>A hotel chain has identically sized
Q34: TABLE 10-20<br>A hotel chain has identically sized
Q53: TABLE 10-8<br>A few years ago, Pepsi invited
Q71: TABLE 10-15<br>The table below presents the summary
Q98: TABLE 10-2<br>A researcher randomly sampled 30 graduates
Q161: The F distribution is symmetric.
Q189: TABLE 10-9<br>The following Excel output contains the
Q208: TABLE 10-12<br>A quality control engineer is in