Solved

TABLE 13-17 Given Below Are Results from the Regression Analysis Where the Where

Question 78

Multiple Choice

TABLE 13-17
Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy) and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) , the number of years of education received (Edu) , the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr) , a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1 = married, 0 = otherwise) , a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1 = yes, 0 = no) and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no) . We shall call this Model 1.
TABLE 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)  and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) , the number of years of education received (Edu) , the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr) , a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1 = married, 0 = otherwise) , a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1 = yes, 0 = no)  and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no) . We shall call this Model 1.         Model 2 is the regression analysis where the dependent variable is Unemploy and the independent variables are Age and Manager. The results of the regression analysis are given below:        -Referring to Table 13-17 Model 1, which of the following is a correct statement? A)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager. B)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the number of predictors and sample size. C)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the level of significance D)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, holding constant the effect of all the independent variables.
TABLE 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)  and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) , the number of years of education received (Edu) , the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr) , a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1 = married, 0 = otherwise) , a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1 = yes, 0 = no)  and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no) . We shall call this Model 1.         Model 2 is the regression analysis where the dependent variable is Unemploy and the independent variables are Age and Manager. The results of the regression analysis are given below:        -Referring to Table 13-17 Model 1, which of the following is a correct statement? A)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager. B)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the number of predictors and sample size. C)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the level of significance D)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, holding constant the effect of all the independent variables.
Model 2 is the regression analysis where the dependent variable is Unemploy and the independent variables are Age and Manager. The results of the regression analysis are given below:
TABLE 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)  and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) , the number of years of education received (Edu) , the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr) , a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1 = married, 0 = otherwise) , a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1 = yes, 0 = no)  and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no) . We shall call this Model 1.         Model 2 is the regression analysis where the dependent variable is Unemploy and the independent variables are Age and Manager. The results of the regression analysis are given below:        -Referring to Table 13-17 Model 1, which of the following is a correct statement? A)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager. B)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the number of predictors and sample size. C)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the level of significance D)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, holding constant the effect of all the independent variables.
TABLE 13-17 Given below are results from the regression analysis where the dependent variable is the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff (Unemploy)  and the independent variables are the age of the worker (Age) , the number of years of education received (Edu) , the number of years at the previous job (Job Yr) , a dummy variable for marital status (Married: 1 = married, 0 = otherwise) , a dummy variable for head of household (Head: 1 = yes, 0 = no)  and a dummy variable for management position (Manager: 1 = yes, 0 = no) . We shall call this Model 1.         Model 2 is the regression analysis where the dependent variable is Unemploy and the independent variables are Age and Manager. The results of the regression analysis are given below:        -Referring to Table 13-17 Model 1, which of the following is a correct statement? A)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager. B)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the number of predictors and sample size. C)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the level of significance D)  49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, holding constant the effect of all the independent variables.
-Referring to Table 13-17 Model 1, which of the following is a correct statement?


A) 49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager.
B) 49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the number of predictors and sample size.
C) 49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, after adjusting for the level of significance
D) 49.49% of the total variation in the number of weeks a worker is unemployed due to a layoff can be explained by the age of the worker, the number of years of education received, the number of years at the previous job, marital status, whether the worker is the head of household, and whether the worker is a manager, holding constant the effect of all the independent variables.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions