\begin{array}{l}{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text { Germany Production Possibilities } } \\{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text { (Production Alternatives) } } \\\begin{array} { | l | c | c | c | c | c | c | } \hline \text { Product } & A & B & C & D & E & F \\\hline \text { Autos } & 0 & 4 & 8 & 12 & 16 & 20 \\\hline \text { Chemicals } & 40 & 32 & 24 & 16 & 8 & 0 \\\hline\end{array}\\\\{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text { U.S. Production Possibilities } } \\{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\text { (Production Alternatives) } } \\\begin{array} { | l | c | c | c | c | c | c | } \hline \text { Product } & A & B & C & D & E & F \\\hline \text { Autos } & 0 & 3 & 6 & 9 & 12 & 15 \\\hline \text { Chemicals } & 60 & 48 & 36 & 24 & 12 & 0 \\\hline\end{array}\end{array}

The data in the accompanying production possibilities tables (in millions of units) suggest that production in
A) Germany is subject to increasing opportunity costs and in the United States to constant opportunity costs.
B) the United States is subject to increasing opportunity costs and in Germany to constant opportunity costs.
C) both Germany and the United States is subject to constant opportunity costs.
D) both Germany and the United States is subject to increasing opportunity costs.

In Comparing a Tariff and an Import Quota, We ﬁNd

Multiple Choice

Correct Answer:VerifiedUnlock this answer nowGet Access to more Verified Answers free of chargeAccess For Free

Correct Answer:
Verified
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge