The Correlations Table Below Indicates That: Correlations ** Correlation Is Significant at the 0

Multiple Choice

The correlations table below indicates that: Correlations
$\begin{array}{|l|l|r|r|}\hline & & {\text { Sales }} & \begin{array}{r}\text { Advertising } \\\text { expenditure }\end{array} \\\hline \text { Sales } & \text { Pearson correlation } & 1 & 0.753 (^{* *}) \\\hline & \text { Sig. (two-tailed) } & & 0.005 \\\hline & N & 100 & 100 \\\hline \begin{array}{l}\text { Adverting } \\\text { expenditure }\end{array} & \text { Pearson correlation } & 0.753 (^{* *}) & 1 \\\hline & \text { Sig. (two-tailed) } & 0.000 & \\\hline & N & 100 & 100 \\\hline\end{array}$ ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed) .

A) about 75 per cent of variance in sales can be explained by the variance in advertising expenditure.
B) about 57 per cent of the variance in advertising expenditure can be explained by the variance in sales.
C) about 57 per cent of the variance in sales can be explained by the variance in advertising expenditure.
D) about 75 per cent of the variance in advertising expenditure can be explained by the variance in sales.