Multiple Choice
A law limiting soft money political contributions
A) was upheld by the Supreme Court because political contributions are not a form of speech.
B) was upheld by the Supreme Court because it regulated only the source of money, not the amount that a candidate could spend.
C) was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because it interfered with a political candidate's right to campaign.
D) None of the above; the Court refused to rule on the issue holding that it was a political question.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: When ruling on a law that banned
Q10: The right to assembly does not include
Q11: Regulation of speech in a public forum
Q12: If defamation is directed to a private
Q13: According to the Supreme Court, under some
Q15: Advertising is protected by the First Amendment
Q16: Defamation has no First Amendment protection unless<br>A)the
Q17: A law banning the burning of a
Q18: Cross burning is never protected by the
Q19: The fairness doctrine<br>A)requires that broadcasters present fair,