Multiple Choice
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court find that there was a taking for which the property owner was entitled to compensation?
A) a new zoning law that totally prohibited a property owner from building a house
B) a 32-month building moratorium on lakefront property
C) a city ordinance that placed restrictions on the development of individual historic landmarks, resulting in petitioner's inability to build offices and causing several million dollars in damages
D) Both a and c
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: The power of eminent domain is found
Q5: Case law that affects or impairs the
Q6: The obligation of a contract under the
Q7: The power of eminent domain exists only
Q8: Whenever any government regulation results in a
Q10: The power of eminent domain can be
Q11: The power of eminent domain<br>A)is extended to
Q12: The Takings Clause applies to property taken
Q13: The government has the right to take
Q14: The Takings Clause is expressly found<br>A)in Article