Multiple Choice
In a state that has a comparative negligence statute, a jury determined that the plaintiff has sustained damages of $50,000 and that the percentages of fault are plaintiff 40 percent negligent, defendant 60 percent negligent.What would be the plaintiff's award of damages in this case?
A) $30,000, or 60 percent
B) $50,000, as she was negligent
C) Nothing because her negligence bars recovery
D) $10,000, or 20 percent, the comparative difference in their negligence
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: The plaintiffs were detained at a store
Q34: Tort cases are generally tried to<br>A) judges.<br>B)
Q35: Neighbors A and B have been arguing
Q36: The essential function of tort law includes<br>A)
Q37: Holmes, an employee of Sims Fruit Market,
Q38: Gordon escaped from authorities in Vermont.While in
Q40: Because tort law is based on the
Q41: Neighbors A and B have been arguing
Q42: A person who causes injury to a
Q43: A college student wrote a blog post