Multiple Choice
Former Iranian hostages and two of their wives filed suit against the United States seeking compensation because the Algiers Accord, the agreement made between the president and Iran that secured their release, deprived them of the right to sue Iran for injuries sustained while being held hostage.The federal appeals court determined that the case involved a policy decision made during a crisis situation by the president and was not subject to judicial review.The court should refuse to adjudicate this dispute based on
A) the political-question doctrine.
B) mootness.
C) ripeness.
D) standing.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: On June 10, 1993, Fireman Bob ran
Q6: The U.S.Courts of Appeals are the only
Q7: A brought suit against B in state
Q8: The plaintiff brought a small claims action
Q9: The res judicata doctrine would preclude the
Q11: State U's basketball coach will be able
Q12: A case is ripe when<br>A) all parties
Q13: The rationale behind claim preclusion is that<br>A)
Q14: If the judicial branch determines that the
Q15: Spousal immunity<br>A) is based on the idea