In Dietz V

Multiple Choice

In Dietz v.Finlay Fine Jewelry,a store clerk who gave an unauthorized discount to a customer was interrogated by security personnel.The court held that:

A) her false imprisonment claim was properly dismissed because the employer had proof that she gave the unauthorized discount
B) she could go to trial on her defamation claim because false, damaging accusations were made in the presence of others
C) she could go to trial on her malicious prosecution claim because the employer pressed criminal charges against her
D) she could go to trial on her infliction of emotional distress claim because she was very upset by the interrogator's questioning of her
E) none of the above