Multiple Choice
SCENARIO 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below.
-Referring to Scenario 10-14, suppose = 0.05.Which of the following represents the correct conclusion?
A) There is no evidence of a difference in the population variances between preservatives I and II.
B) There is evidence of a difference in the population variances between preservatives I and II.
C) There is no evidence that the population variances between preservatives I and II are the same.
D) There is evidence that the population variances between preservatives I and II are the same.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Moving companies are required by the government
Q9: SCENARIO 10-4 Two samples each of size
Q15: SCENARIO 10-10 A corporation randomly selects 150
Q16: SCENARIO 10-3 A real estate company is
Q63: SCENARIO 10-10<br>A corporation randomly selects 150
Q65: SCENARIO 10-6<br>To investigate the efficacy of a
Q103: SCENARIO 10-14<br>The use of preservatives by food
Q132: SCENARIO 10-14<br>The use of preservatives by food
Q177: SCENARIO 10-8<br>A few years ago,Pepsi invited consumers
Q207: SCENARIO 10-5<br>To test the effectiveness of a