Multiple Choice
The difference between direct and circumstantial evidence is:
A) direct evidence requires the use of an inference but circumstantial evidence does not.
B) circumstantial evidence requires the use of an inference but direct evidence does not.
C) direct evidence requires judicial discretion but circumstantial evidence is not.
D) circumstantial evidence requires the use of a presumption but direct evidence does not.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: If the defense wants a presumption to
Q23: Nate's testimony would be considered circumstantial evidence
Q24: Relevant evidence may be excluded if its
Q25: What would be considered testimonial evidence<br>A)All of
Q26: When the defendant enters a plea of
Q28: What testimony would be considered cumulative<br>A)Larry's statement
Q29: When a piece of evidence is referred
Q30: Cumulative evidence:<br>A)restates what another witness has already
Q31: Direct evidence establishes a fact without an
Q32: In a criminal trial, jurors cannot base