Multiple Choice
Sam is sitting in a courtroom doing an assignment for his evidence class. He hears Paul, the Prosecutor, and Dick, the Defense Attorney, talking to Judge John:
· Paul asked the judge to accept a stipulation that the defendant had a prior conviction. Dick denied that the defendant had ever been convicted before.
· Dick asked the judge to take judicial notice of the fact that it was daylight at 10 a.m. on June 5.
· Paul asked the judge to instruct the jury on a presumption. Dick objected on the grounds that Paul had not established the basic fact beyond a reasonable doubt. Should Judge John give a jury instruction about the presumption as requested by Paul?
A) Yes, the prosecution is allowed to introduce presumptions in criminal cases as long as there is some basis in fact for them.
B) Yes, as long as Dick has an opportunity to introduce evidence to disprove the presumed fact.
C) No, Dick is correct. The prosecution must establish the basic fact beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases.
D) No, presumptions are unconstitutional in criminal cases.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: A presumption is an inference that jurors
Q4: The most common reason for an attorney
Q18: An inference is:<br>A)a conclusion that the judge
Q29: When a piece of evidence is referred
Q32: In a criminal trial, jurors cannot base
Q38: Ricky has been charged with grand theft
Q39: Mary is on trial for child abuse.
Q42: Ricky has been charged with grand theft
Q43: Circumstantial evidence relies on inferences to establish
Q44: Ricky has been charged with grand theft