Multiple Choice
Prior consistent statements are admissible:
A) To impeach a witness
B) To rehabilitate a witness
C) To corroborate testimony
D) Prior consistent statements are admissible for all of these purposes
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q18: The prosecution can introduce a statement under
Q19: Can Mary's identification of Ned as the
Q20: Will Kim be allowed to testify that
Q21: Hearsay is admissible in court only if
Q22: A co-conspirator's statement can be used at
Q24: Which is more important under the Dying
Q25: Testimony about reputation is not admissible at
Q26: Admissions of a party to the case
Q27: Statements police obtain from the crime victim
Q28: Under the Mental and Physical State Exception