Multiple Choice
Jerry and Kim were charged with grand theft for stealing a famous painting from a museum. The prosecution claims that Jerry planned the heist but the theft was carried out by Kim and Lewis. Lewis was given immunity in exchange for testifying against Jerry. Kim entered a guilty plea. Will Kim be allowed to testify that Mike, a mutual friend, told her that Jerry told him that he planned to sell the painting for $1 million?
A) Yes, Kim's statement falls under co-conspirator statements.
B) Yes, Jerry's statement is an admission.
C) No, what Jerry told Mike is double hearsay.
D) No, Kim lacks credibility because she is a co-conspirator.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: How does a spontaneous statement differ from
Q7: To qualify for the Dying Declaration Exception
Q14: Which exception to the Hearsay Rule is
Q22: A co-conspirator's statement can be used at
Q26: Admissions of a party to the case
Q41: A statement made by the defendant falls
Q43: Mary worked at a bank. Ned approached
Q45: Oscar is on trial for beating Lola,
Q46: Which of the following exceptions to the
Q53: The Ancient Documents Exception to the Hearsay