Multiple Choice
Jerry and Kim were charged with grand theft for stealing a famous painting from a museum. The prosecution claims that Jerry planned the heist but the theft was carried out by Kim and Lewis. Lewis was given immunity in exchange for testifying against Jerry. Kim entered a guilty plea. Will Kim be allowed to testify that, the day after she agreed to help steal the painting, Jerry told her how to disable the security cameras at the museum?
A) Yes, it is a statement by a co-conspirator.
B) Yes, it is a spontaneous statement.
C) No, it is a declaration against interest.
D) No, unless someone from the security company testifies.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: An adoptive (tacit) admission is:<br>A)A gesture or
Q8: "Statement" as used in the Hearsay Rule
Q16: A transcript of testimony at the preliminary
Q25: Testimony about reputation is not admissible at
Q26: Admissions of a party to the case
Q34: Explain why the Hearsay Rule was developed
Q40: To be admissible under the Reputation Exception
Q41: A statement made by the defendant falls
Q44: Some states allow police officers to testify
Q50: Statements made by crime victims are admissible