Multiple Choice
Carlos carelessly ran a red light, and struck Cantwell, a pedestrian, all in full view of several bystanders. When Cantwell sued Carlos for damages, all the witnesses testified that Carlos did indeed run the light. Nevertheless, the jury found Carlos had met his duty of care and therefore was not liable for the injuries. The judge, however, responding to a motion from Cantwell's attorney, found Carlos negligent and liable on the basis of the overwhelming evidence presented at trial. Which of the following statements best describes the judge's action?
A) This is illegal, as it would be double jeopardy.
B) This was improper, because the judge cannot overrule a jury.
C) This is proper and is called voir dire .
D) The judge has the power to grant the motion and it is called a judgment n.o.v.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: The burden of proof in a civil
Q47: A suit demanding money damages is a
Q48: What is the distinction between jurisdiction over
Q49: Alice is a possible juror in a
Q50: One example of a long-arm statute is
Q52: Describe the differences between trial and appellate
Q53: Which of the following is a typical
Q54: _ jurisdiction may exist when a plaintiff
Q55: An appeal is conducted<br>A)Before a single judge<br>B)Like
Q56: Solomon filed a complaint that stated: "I