Multiple Choice
When police use lineup procedures to obtain identifications of criminals from eyewitnesses, which is better, the match-to-suspect approach or the match-to-culprit approach?
A) The match-to-suspect approach-because it less likely to result in mistaken identifications.
B) The match-to-suspect approach-because it is less likely to promote own-race bias.
C) The match-to-culprit approach-because it is more likely to promote own-race bias.
D) The match-to-culprit approach-because it is less likely to result in mistaken identifications.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: Juries for robbery trials, assault trials, and
Q7: Suppose that, during jury selection for a
Q8: A request made by an attorney that
Q9: Research on estimator variables has found that
Q10: During the jury selection process, attorneys often
Q12: In a properly constructed lineup, wherein eyewitnesses
Q13: Mikael was involved in a bank robbery.
Q14: Lineup members other than the suspect who
Q15: People with a(n)_ personality are more likely
Q16: When jurors have been exposed to negative