True/False
In Herring v. U.S. (2009), SCOTUS held that if an officer makes an arrest, reasonably (but wrongly)believing there's an outstanding arrest warrant against the suspect, the arrest violates the Fourth Amendment, but evidence obtained during a search incident to the unlawful arrest is admissible in court.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Detail five possible negative effects of the
Q46: SCOTUS has ruled that the exclusionary rule
Q47: How often does evidence seized illegally result
Q48: Empirical research suggests that the _ costs
Q49: In what case did SCOTUS hold that,
Q51: Discuss two SCOTUS opinions that expand the
Q52: The _ _ exception allows illegally obtained
Q53: Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence
Q54: The ethical exception says that illegally obtained
Q55: _ _ is a term used to