In Graham V

Multiple Choice

In Graham v. Connor (1989) , involving the arrest of a diabetic who was suffering from an insulin reaction, SCOTUS held that claims of excessive force in the course of making an arrest are to be analyzed under: ​

A) a substantive due process standard.
B) the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard.
C) a "malicious and sadistic" standard.
D) a subjective standard that focuses on the intentions of the officer making the arrest.