Multiple Choice
A written, integrated contract contains a provision that states it will be effective for a "year." The plaintiff in a lawsuit claims that a "year" is obviously 12 months. The defendant claims that the contract meant a 10-month school year. In this case:
A) parol evidence cannot be used to explain the term, because the plain meaning of a "year" is 12 months.
B) parol evidence cannot be used to explain the term, because it is in an integrated document.
C) the term "year" is ambiguous, and the parties can bring in parol evidence to clarify their intent.
D) parol evidence cannot be used, because the contract contains an express term that could have been changed by the parties prior to the contract's execution.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: The UCC permits an oral agreement for
Q8: Chris receives a printed form in the
Q9: Abco Corp. is building a new office
Q10: The executor-administrator provision applies to promises of
Q14: Sam orally agreed to sell his house
Q15: The suretyship provision rule within the statute
Q16: On March 20, Alan orally agrees to
Q28: The statute of frauds has to do
Q58: An example of language creating a suretyship
Q61: A collateral promise is an undertaking to