Multiple Choice
Alice is browsing in a commercial art gallery when she sees a painting that she likes. Arthur, who is the manager of the gallery, tells her that in his opinion the painting is a genuine Leroy Neiman work. Based upon that representation, Alice buys the work for $5,000. She later discovers that the painting is only a cheap copy of the original that is worth no more than $50. Arthur has:
A) breached an express warranty to Alice that the painting is a Neiman work.
B) breached the warranty of merchantability.
C) not breached a warranty because he was merely expressing his opinion.
D) breached an express warranty, the warranty of merchantability, and the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Contributory negligence is not a defense to
Q3: Mark tells Leslie that his sweeper has
Q4: In the Womco, Inc. v. Navistar International
Q5: Few obstacles to recovery in warranty cases
Q6: The main provision of the Restatement (Third)
Q6: Under Alternative A of the Code's horizontal
Q9: Ed buys a car from a friend
Q10: A salesperson at Quality Furniture showed Camila
Q38: Horizontal privity pertains to remote sellers within
Q57: The Code does not label the warranty