Multiple Choice
In the case of In Re KeyTronics , the court held that:
A) the intent of the parties to form a partnership is controlling as to partnership formation under the RUPA.
B) there is a requirement that the parties have a specific agreement in order to form a partnership.
C) the intent of the parties to form a partnership will be ascertained objectively from all the evidence and circumstances.
D) under Section 202(a) of the RUPA, the intent necessary to form an association refers to the intent to form a partnership per se.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following is NOT an
Q9: The RUPA treats a partnership as a
Q10: Bert and Philip have decided to form
Q11: Assignment of a partner's interest will cause
Q12: Some states allow the formation of partnerships
Q14: A judicial lien against a partner's transferable
Q15: Kean and Bubnick are real estate agents
Q16: Afterburn Corporation and the Mangus Trust can be
Q17: Compare "partnership property" with a "partner's interest."
Q18: Former partners, as well as current partners,