Essay
The 1933 Securities Act defines the term "security." The Supreme Court of the United States has adopted a two-tier analysis of what constitutes a security. Within this analysis the Court has used a three-part test to determine whether a non-traditional financial transaction constitutes an investment contract and thus a security. Explain
(a) the 1933 Act's statutory definition of security,
(b) the courts' general interpretation of the 1933 Act's definition and
(c) the Supreme Court's two-tier test. Use case law to illustrate your explanation, if appropriate. Also, why do you think the Supreme Court had to devise such an analysis?
Correct Answer:

Verified
(a) Any note; stock; bond; debenture; ev...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q62: A registration statement becomes public immediately on
Q69: Insiders would violate the short-swing profits rule
Q70: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is
Q71: The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock
Q72: The 1933 Securities Act differs from the
Q74: If Terry makes a tender offer to
Q75: As amended in 2008, SEC rules define
Q76: The Securities Act of 1933 identifies a
Q77: Emerging growth companies (EGCs) have strict disclosure
Q78: Effective in 2010, the SEC adopted new