Multiple Choice
In NAACP v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue , the NAACP sued the North Hudson fire department for disparate impact discrimination because the fire department required that potential firefighters live in North Hudson. In North Hudson, only 3% of the population was African-American, while in the Tri-county area, 37.4% of protective services workers were African-American. North Hudson claimed that residency was a business necessity. The court ruled:
A) for the NAACP, because there were less discriminatory means of achieving the fire department's goals
B) for the NAACP, because the fire department intentionally discriminated based on race
C) for the North Hudson Fire Department, because it was reasonable to require firefighters to live in the city so that they were familiar with streets and buildings
D) for the North Hudson Fire Department, because the NAACP had not proved a prima facie case of discrimination
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: In order to prevent discrimination against applicants
Q10: It is a violation of anti-discrimination laws
Q11: Which of the following would not create
Q12: Which of the following is true regarding
Q13: Determining whether discrimination has occurred during recruitment
Q15: Which of the following is true regarding
Q16: For purposes of determining discrimination in recruitment,
Q17: Why is each of the following good
Q18: Which of the following is a difference
Q19: Which of the following practices would be